<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<XML><RECORDS>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Jürgen Umbrich*</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Katja Hose*</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Marcel Karnstedt</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Andreas Harth*</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Axel Polleres*</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2011</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Comparing Data Summaries for Processing Live Queries over Linked Data</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>WWW Journal (Springer US), Special Issue &quot;Querying the Data Web&quot;</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>14</VOLUME>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>index</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>structures,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Linked</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Data,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>RDF</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>querying</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD></KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<ABSTRACT>&lt;p&gt;A growing amount of Linked Data&amp;mdash;graph-structured data accessible at  sources distributed across the Web&amp;mdash;enables advanced data             integration and decision-making applications. Typical  systems operating on Linked Data collect (crawl) and pre-process (index)             large amounts of data, and evaluate queries against a  centralised repository. Given that crawling and indexing are  time-consuming             operations, the data in the centralised index may be out of  date at query execution time. An ideal query answering system             for querying Linked Data live should return current answers  in a reasonable amount of time, even on corpora as large as the             Web. In such a live query system source  selection&amp;mdash;determining which sources contribute answers to a query&amp;mdash;is a  crucial step.             In this article we propose to use lightweight data summaries  for determining relevant sources during query evaluation. We             compare several data structures and hash functions with  respect to their suitability for building such summaries, stressing             benefits for queries that contain joins and require ranking  of results and sources. We elaborate on join variants, join ordering             and ranking. We analyse the different approaches  theoretically and provide results of an extensive experimental  evaluation.&lt;/p&gt;</ABSTRACT>
	<NOTES><p>* Non-Clique Members</p></NOTES>
	<URL>http://www.springerlink.com/content/p72226181132j60l/</URL>
</RECORD>
</RECORDS></XML>